Moving

Cost of Living Calculator

What salary keeps your standard of living after a move?

Multiply by the ratio of BEA price parities. $80,000 in Austin needs about $84,510 in Chicago and $91,826 in New York overall, but an $1,800 Austin rent behaves like $2,223 in New York, because the housing line (149) runs far above the overall index (113). Compute your pair below.

BEA price parity for every state and 388 metro areas, with goods and housing broken out as separate lines, because the rent is where a relocation budget actually succeeds or fails.

Updated October 22, 2026

Compare two places

Parities are the BEA's 2024 release, the current edition. A parity of 110 means prices average 10% above the national level. After parity, run the tax side on our take-home pay pages; a cheaper city in a heavier tax state can hand the saving back.

Salary needed at the destination to live the same
$0
same standard of living
Equivalent rent at the destination
$0
Overall price gap
0%
Goods price gap
0%
Housing (rent) gap
0%

Why rent gets its own line

Most cost-of-living comparisons publish one index number, and the number lies politely. The Bureau of Economic Analysis does not make that mistake: its Regional Price Parities split prices into goods, housing (rents), utilities, and other services, and the split is where moving decisions actually live, because the components move in different directions. Goods cost roughly the same everywhere, within a few percent, because a television is a national market. Rents are a local auction, and in expensive metros they run 40 to 55% above the national level while goods sit near 105. A household that spends a third of its income on rent experiences the housing line, not the headline index.

Three worked parities on a $80,000 salary

All from the 2024 BEA release, computed exactly as the calculator above computes them:

MoveOverall parity neededAn $1,800 rent becomesWhat drives it
Austin, TX to Chicago, IL$84,510$1,675Austin prices sit near the national level overall (98.1) while its rents already run hot (120.4); Chicago's overall index (103.6) is lower than its reputation, so the raise needed is modest.
Austin, TX to New York, NY$91,826$2,223The New York metro's overall parity is 112.6 and its housing line is 148.6; the salary ask is driven almost entirely by the rent line below.
Texas to California (states)$91,262$2,879State parities hide metro spread, but the statewide gap (97.1 to 110.7) is the honest average when the destination city is not yet chosen.

Read the New York row twice. The overall parity says an $80,000 Austin salary needs about $91,826 in New York. The rent line says the $1,800 Austin rent behaves like $2,223. A raise that satisfies the first number while ignoring the second is how relocations quietly fail: the household accepts the "equivalent" offer, then spends the difference on housing and concludes the city is unaffordable in ways the index never mentioned. Weight the lines by your own budget shares, not the average household's.

How to use parity in a negotiation

Parity is a floor for a conversation, not a demand. Employers relocating staff often use commercial indices that weight executive baskets; the BEA measure weights what residents actually buy, and it is public, which makes it the defensible number to put on the table. If an offer matches overall parity but your rent share is above average, show the housing line; it is the same federal dataset, not a second opinion. If the destination is cheaper overall, parity runs the other way, and the calculator handles the direction automatically: a nominal pay cut smaller than the parity gap is a raise in the only terms that matter, what the money buys when it arrives.

What parity cannot see

Parities measure prices, not taxes, wages, or quality. State and local taxes are deliberately excluded from the BEA index, which is why this page links the take-home pay comparison instead of pretending one number finishes the job. Childcare, insurance premiums, and commuting costs vary by household more than by metro. And the 2024 release describes 2024: a metro in a rent spike will look gentler in this data than at the leasing office. Treat the output as the researched opening position, then verify the two or three prices that dominate your own budget.

State or metro: which geography is honest

The calculator offers both because the honest unit depends on the decision. For choosing between job offers in known cities, the metro is the real economy: the New York metro's parity of 112.6 describes a labor and housing market that the New York State figure, dragged toward the national mean by upstate, actively misdescribes. For moves where the city is not yet chosen (a remote worker picking a state, a retiree shortlisting), the state parity is the honest average, and its proper use is eliminating candidates, not pricing offers. The failure mode to avoid is mixing the levels: a state-level raise justified by a metro-level life. Run the pair you will actually live, at the level you will actually live it.

Remote work and the parity arbitrage, with the caveat priced

The arithmetic that launched a thousand relocations is real: keep a parity-112 salary, live at parity 92, and you have given yourself roughly a 20% raise in purchasing power without asking anyone. The caveats are also real, and they are priced in different currencies. Some employers re-localize pay on a schedule they control, not you. State tax residency follows you with its own rules (and the take-home pages will show the second number). And parity is an average across a metro that contains both the neighborhood you will choose and several you will not; the rent line for your specific neighborhood can erase the arbitrage by itself. The arbitrage survives these caveats for many households, but it survives as a researched position, not as a headline.

Parity drift: the number moves

BEA revises parities annually, and metros in transition move: Austin's overall parity climbed steadily through the last decade as its housing line rose, while several legacy manufacturing metros drifted the other way. A parity computed today is a photograph, and for a move you will live in for a decade, the trend matters at the margin: two candidate cities at parity 98 and 101 today are different propositions if the first has risen six points in five years. The honest habit is to recompute with each annual release during your first years in a new place, the same fall ritual as re-pricing insurance, and to be suspicious of any relocation case built on parities older than the current release. This calculator always runs the freshest BEA edition and labels the year wherever the figures are quoted.

Sources and data: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Price Parities by state and metropolitan area, 2024 release (all items, goods, services: housing, services: other). BEA publishes RPPs with a lag; 2024 is the current edition as of October 2026. See also our data methodology. Figures are estimates for planning, not financial advice.

Frequently asked questions

How much salary do I need in a new city to keep my standard of living?

Multiply your current salary by the ratio of the two places' BEA overall price parities. An $80,000 salary in Austin (parity 98.1) needs about $91,800 in the New York metro (parity 112.6). Then check the housing line separately, because rent rarely moves with the average.

Why is the rent number so different from the overall number?

Because BEA measures housing separately and rents are the most local price there is. Goods differ by a few percent between metros; rents differ by 40 to 55% at the extremes, and households feel prices in proportion to their own spending, not the average basket.

Does cost of living include taxes?

The BEA parity does not; it measures prices only. EveryCalc handles the tax side on its take-home pay pages for each state, and a complete relocation comparison uses both numbers.

How current is the BEA data?

The calculator uses the 2024 Regional Price Parities, the current release as of October 2026. BEA revises annually, and each release describes the prior year's prices.

Should I demand a parity raise from my employer?

Parity is the researched floor for the conversation, and it is defensible because the data is public and federal. Whether a given employer matches it depends on their policy; showing the housing line separately, if your rent share is high, is the strongest form of the argument.